Overestimating memory abilities
Beginners treat blindfold chess like a memory test, drilling move lists and waiting for fluency. But blindfold chess memory is spatial, not sequential. You maintain a changing mental model where pieces interact across 64 squares. Practice without sight improves pattern recognition and spatial processing rather than just memory recall. When Marchesich and Tamburini tested 27 players (Elo 1650-2100) after blindfold training, they solved tactics 31% faster. A control group that drilled notation without visualization did not show notable improvement, while a Chessable blindfold tactics project demonstrated a 31 percent decrease in solving times and an average Rapid FIDE rating increase by 26 percent among participants. The cognitive load comes from tracking relationships, such as knight forks, pawn chains, and king safety, then updating after every move. Players focused on recall hit a ceiling around move 10, when these interactions exceed working memory. Fix it with coordinate drills to anchor pieces in space. Start here: coordinate drills. Shift from "what happened" to "what exists where" so memory supports, not blocks, board awareness.Ignoring the power of visualization
Players who skip visualization drills hit a wall around move 12, because sequential memory cannot hold a full board state. Guillermo Campitelli and Fernand Gobet found visual imagery is important for chess problem solving. According to a 2023 pilot study summarized in a Chess.com blog post by Giovanni Marchesich and Laura Tamburini, players practicing blindfold tactics achieved a 31% reduction in tactics solving time and a 26% increase in Rapid FIDE Elo, compared to those using board-based tactics. The study highlights the effectiveness of blindfold practice, particularly for males and players over 1900 Elo, despite possible biases in group sizes and gender participation. Experts show lower "participation ratio," a neural efficiency that supports clearer visual processing. Constantino et al. (2025) link this efficiency to mastery in chess, via networks engaging visual cortex pathways. Build it with static-to-dynamic drills: close your eyes and name a piece’s attacked squares, then move a knight from b1 to five squares mentally, then combine pieces. See: visualization exercises. Verification is instant. Strong visualizers answer "What color is f6?" without counting. Weak visualizers count squares, relying on memory rather than spatial awareness. Fix visualization first and memory gets faster and more accurate.Practicing without a structured plan
Random practice creates random results. Jumping between blindfold games, coordinates, and memorized positions wastes time through redundancy. Set one measurable goal per 20-day cycle. "Reconstruct 10-move sequences with 90% square accuracy" is testable. Skipping review cuts retention by about 40%. Track errors by type, not just count. Misplaced piece vs wrong square vs position lost after move 8 point to different fixes. Keep a simple log with date, exercise type, errors, and notes. See steady gains within 15 days; if not, tighten the goal or retarget the bottleneck.Neglecting analytical skills
Coordinates build a base, but analytical skills win blindfold games. According to research cited by Chessable (2023), a study involving blindfold tactics training significantly improved solving times and Rapid FIDE Elo ratings for a group of 27 participants, with greater improvements noted for players rated above 1900 Elo (p<0.05). The benefit appears only when you analyze, not just replay moves. After each session, reconstruct the game on a physical board before checking your notes. An e4 vs e5 mismatch shows coordinate confusion; a forgotten bishop flags scanning gaps. Use standardized tests: solve the same 10 Neishtadt (2010) tactics before starting and after 30 days. In Marchesich and Tamburini’s protocol, calculation depth rose by 1.2 moves. Track time to solution, candidate moves considered, and final evaluation accuracy. Flat lines mean you’re training recall, not analysis. Study annotated blindfold games from Timman and Tal. Add one technique weekly: chunking (group pieces by function), anchor squares (stable reference points), and verification loops (check critical squares twice).Rushing through games
Speed compounds errors in blindfold play. GM Jonathan Tisdall noted blindfold skill was central to some GMs’ success. Wilhelm Steinitz reportedly spent 45 minutes on a single move in his 1886 blindfold exhibition against Zukertort, verifying knight paths and pawn chains before playing, and won. Patience preserves the model you’re calculating from. Time controls shape stamina. Alternate 90+30 with 10+5 to train thoroughness and efficiency. Standard games force full reconstruction before each move. Rapid helps only after you build verification habits. Set minimum think times: three minutes for captures, five for sacrifices, two for checks. Track accuracy versus time and find your break-even. Many players see 40-60% fewer errors by adding one minute to verify lines. Build speed with coordinate drills at varied tempos.Ignoring physical and mental fatigue
Blindfold chess drains cognition fast. "Recent research emphasizes that performance in blindfold chess sessions tends to decline over extended periods, especially as fatigue sets in. It is recommended to monitor for cognitive strain and incorporate breaks to maintain accuracy and reduce error rates." A 90-minute cap protects quality. Dehydration slows spatial processing. Long sitting reduces prefrontal blood flow. Strong blindfold players stand between games, walk during opponent time, and train before noon. One GM credits a standing desk and 5-minute movement breaks every 45 minutes for steady 3-hour calculation accuracy.Lack of feedback and self-reflection
Without feedback, you reinforce mistakes. "In their 2024 study, Marchesich and Tamburini observed significant fluctuations in player performance when participants revisited tactics after a period of time." Some showed improvements while others experienced declines, with the interaction demonstrating significance at p<0.005. Time plus review differentiates growth from drift. Log each session: recall accuracy, time per move, and error patterns by piece. Note positions that caused hesitation or visualization loss. Afterward, answer three questions: Where did I lose the position mentally? Which calculations failed? Which known patterns did I miss? External checks add what you can’t see. Run games through engines to spot tactical oversights and strategic misreads. Compare your mental board to the true position at decision points. A coach or partner can flag recurring blind spots, like overestimating knight reach or misreading queenside pawn structures.Misunderstanding game strategy development
Tactical sharpness can hide strategic gaps. You might spot forks yet lose because your opponent reached an outpost first. RB Ramesh notes many students visualize better because they read chess books without sets, which forces attention to plans and structures, not only tactics.Not tracking progress over time
If you can’t measure change, practice becomes ritual. In a 2024 study, players who tracked metrics improved tactics by 31% and rapid ratings by 26% over six months. Control groups with similar practice volume but no tracking saw minimal gains. Start with blindfold ratings where available, such as Lichess variants. Log date, rating, and games weekly. After three months, graph the trend. Rising ratings show transfer; flat lines signal reinforced errors. Track components, not just outcomes. Time your coordinate speed weekly, count squares correct per minute, and separate knight-path accuracy from diagonal recognition. Add columns for position reconstruction, knight calculation time, and tactics success rate.Frequently Asked Questions
Last updated: Feb 24, 2026

Antoine Tamano
Angers France
I’m Antoine Tamano, founder of Instablog — a tool that helps businesses turn existing website content into a consistent, SEO-friendly blog. After working with startups and larger companies, I saw how hard it was to keep up with blogging, even when the value was clear. Instablog was born from a simple idea: make blogging easier using what’s already there. Here, I share what I’ve learned building Instablog and why smart content should be core to any growth strategy.



